Eliezer Scheiner: Net Worth and Business Interests

Eliezer Scheiner appears in public nursing-home ownership, regulatory, and court records. His net worth is not reliably established by the available evidence. Understanding his finances requires separating documented ownership interests from company assets, regulatory decisions, and personal financial obligations.

Eliezer Scheiner’s Business Background and Net Worth

Scheiner’s documented business activities include ownership interests in skilled nursing facilities and a personal guaranty connected to a hotel-ground-lease transaction. These records establish business involvement, but they do not disclose how much income he received or what his ownership stakes are worth.

There is no sufficiently supported published estimate in the available research to assign him a net worth figure.

Three distinct matters help establish that picture:

• An ownership entry for a nursing facility in Liberty, New York.
• A New Jersey Medicaid application denial involving a proposed nursing-home acquisition.
• A civil judgment arising from a hotel-related personal guaranty.

Each answers a different question. Each addresses a distinct business or legal matter.

How to Verify Eliezer Scheiner’s Ownership Records

Choose the official record that matches the business or transaction you are investigating.

What You Want to Check	Official Record to Use	What It Establishes
Ownership of the Liberty nursing facility	Facility profile	The disclosed operator, ownership entry, capacity, and facility identifiers
The proposed South Jersey Extended Care acquisition	New Jersey Medicaid Fraud Division’s Bridgeton SNF application review	The application decision, named applicants, and agency findings
Liability under the hotel-related guaranty	Browne & Appel, LLC v Lichtschein	The civil judgment and the appellate court’s ruling

For the Liberty facility, complete the following checks before treating a name match as an ownership match.

Step 1: Match the Facility and Operator

1. Locate the facility at 170 Lake Street, Liberty, NY 12754. The facility profile identifies its operator as WMOP, LLC (For Profit).
2. Check the facility’s listed capacity: 140 total beds. This describes the individual nursing facility, not the size of Scheiner’s wider business interests.

The legal operator matters because a facility’s public-facing name and the company operating it can differ. A search result containing a familiar nursing-home name is not enough to establish an ownership connection.

Step 2: Match the Ownership Entry and Identifiers

1. Find the entry “Scheiner, Eliezer (0.4501).” The disclosed ownership fraction is 0.4501, equivalent to 45.01%.
2. Cross-check the facility’s PFI identifier, 0962, and operating certificate, 5220303N.

These identifiers provide a stronger match than the owner’s name alone. They help match the facility and operator listed in the record.

The ownership entry establishes a disclosed stake in this facility’s operating structure. The market value of that stake or ownership of every asset used by the business remains unestablished.

Step 3: Save a Dated Ownership Record

1. Save the official profile with the date you accessed it. Keep the operator, ownership entry, and facility identifiers together.
2. Describe the result as a facility-specific ownership record. Do not turn an ownership entry into an unsupported claim that Scheiner is the facility’s administrator or personally manages its daily operations.

The finished result should identify the facility, the legal operator, and Scheiner’s disclosed interest as shown in the saved record. An access date documents when you checked the page; it does not independently establish when an ownership change occurred.

New Jersey’s Medicaid Denial and the Wider Portfolio

The New York facility record and the New Jersey Medicaid denial concern different facilities and different regulatory questions.

The Bridgeton SNF Application

On November 20, 2025, New Jersey’s Office of the State Comptroller announced that the proposed ownership group seeking to purchase South Jersey Extended Care had been denied participation in New Jersey Medicaid.

The application review denied the Medicaid provider application submitted on behalf of Bridgeton SNF, LLC.

The cited legal provisions were N.J.A.C. 10:49-3.2(f) and N.J.A.C. 10:49-11.1(d)(20), (22), and (23).

The Office of the State Comptroller concluded that the proposed group posed “an unacceptably high risk of fraud, waste, and abuse.” Its findings included opaque ownership arrangements, undisclosed financial ties, and concerns about the quality records of facilities linked to prospective owners.

These were findings supporting an administrative Medicaid eligibility decision. They should not be restated as a criminal conviction.

The decision also should not be used to assign a regulatory status to the Liberty facility. It concerned the proposed South Jersey Extended Care transaction and the applicants named in the denial, not a review of the New York ownership entry.

The Fountain Springs Transaction

The New Jersey review also examined ownership arrangements associated with Fountain Springs at Cape May, formerly Oceana Rehabilitation and Nursing Center.

In that transaction-era discussion, Lichtschein and Scheiner had a portfolio of ownership interests in 118 other skilled nursing facilities spread over five states, according to the Medicaid Fraud Division.

That description needs several distinctions:

• It concerns ownership interests associated with Lichtschein and Scheiner, not a count attributable solely to Scheiner.
• It describes the portfolio in the context of the reviewed transaction, not a verified current inventory.
• It counts facilities, not beds.
• The record does not establish full ownership of each facility.

A large portfolio can involve minority stakes, separate operating and property companies, and substantial financing obligations.

The Hotel Guaranty Judgment

A separate public record concerns a hotel transaction rather than nursing-home operations.

In Browne & Appel, LLC v Lichtschein, 2023 NY Slip Op 04568, New York’s Appellate Division affirmed a civil judgment against Eliezer Scheiner arising from a personal guaranty connected to a hotel-ground-lease transaction in Tarrytown, New York. The hotel was owned by 455 Hospitality, LLC.

The judgment, dated October 6, 2020, awarded $1,500,000 in principal. With interest through the judgment date, the total was $2,473,479.45.

The guaranty was a guaranty of payment, not collection. In this case, the court considered a personal guaranty involving Scheiner. The appellate court upheld the judgment insofar as appealed.

For a financial profile, this establishes a documented personal financial obligation at a particular point in time. How much remains unpaid today is unknown. A current balance would require subsequent records concerning payment, enforcement, settlement, or satisfaction.

It would also be incorrect to describe the award as a nursing-home penalty. The judgment arose from the hotel-related guaranty.

What to Check Before Accepting a Net Worth Estimate

A credible net worth estimate must value the interests a person actually owns and account for their liabilities. Revenue, government reimbursements, facility capacity, and the total value of a company’s property are not interchangeable with personal wealth.

For Scheiner, a defensible published estimate would need to address:

• Valuation date: When were the assets and obligations assessed?
• Ownership attribution: Which interests belong to Scheiner, rather than a partner, trust, or other entity?
• Equity value: What are those interests worth after relevant business debt is considered?
• Personal liabilities: Which obligations remain outstanding, rather than merely appearing in historical litigation?
• Calculation method: Is there a transparent basis for the estimate?

Corporate structures make these distinctions especially important. A nursing-home operating company may provide care while a separate property company owns the building. An interest in one does not automatically establish an equivalent interest in the other.

Nor should public funds received by a nursing-home business be treated as money paid personally to an owner.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Eliezer Scheiner Also Known as Eli Scheiner?

Yes. A court record identifies Eliezer Scheiner as “also known as Eli Scheiner.” A name match still needs to be connected to the relevant company or transaction. The official caption in Browne & Appel, LLC v Lichtschein identifies Eliezer Scheiner as “also known as Eli Scheiner.” That documented alias can help with searches, but a name match still needs to be connected to the relevant company or transaction.

Is Eliezer Scheiner the Same Person as Louis Scheiner?

The available official records do not establish that Louis Scheiner is another name for Eliezer Scheiner. Do not merge their identities, business interests, or financial information based on a shared surname or a search suggestion.

What Is Eliezer Scheiner’s Connection to TL Management?

Scheiner has been publicly associated with TL Management in reporting about nursing-home businesses and pandemic relief funding. The official records supporting this profile do not establish his current title, ownership percentage, or complete corporate relationship with that company, so a more specific present-day role should not be assumed.